LA/Ventura

AB 820 To Create An Interest Exclusion For Small Biz Loans

A ‘qualified small business’ would be one that has 50 or fewer full-time employees.

On March 18, Assemblyman Ken Cooley (D-Sacramento) amended his Assembly Bill 820 to create an interest exclusion for small business loans. The bill would add Sections 24313.5 and 25128.1 to the Revenue and Taxation Code. As a tax levy measure, it would take effect immediately upon enactment.

This article was written by Chris Micheli of the California Globe.com.

Section One of the bill would add Revenue and Taxation Code Section 24313.5 to exclude from gross income the amount of qualified interest income generated by a qualified taxpayer. The exclusion would begin January 1, 2021. The new provision of law would define the following terms: “full-time equivalent”; “qualified interest income” (which is generated by a qualified loan); “qualified loan” ($1 million or less made by a qualified taxpayer to a qualified small business between March 15, 2020 and December 31, 2024).

A “qualified small business” would be one that has 50 or fewer full-time employees, experienced an annual loss in net revenue or 10% or more since March 15, 2020, and is located in California. A “qualified taxpayer” would be a bank or financial corporation that generates business income that is solely derived from or attributable to sources within California.

Section Two of the bill would add Revenue and Taxation Code Section 25128.1 to provide that a qualified taxpayer who apportions its business income must exclude the amount of qualified interest income from its calculation of the sales factor. For purposes of this section of law, all the terms defined above would be utilized in this section of law as well.

Section Three of the bill would specify compliance with Revenue and Taxation Code Section 41 and the Legislature would find and declare that the purpose of this new section of law would be to encourage financial institutions to issue loans to small businesses in this state. It would also require the Legislative Analyst to work with the Franchise Tax Board to analyze whether the tax benefits met the specified goals and objectives.

The bill is expected to be heard in its first policy committee in April.

Share
U Cast Studios

Recent Posts

  • Lifestyle

Instead Of Hating Your HOA, Make Your City Take Responsibility

Homeowners associations (HOAs) are notorious punching bags, shamed for bullying widows to mow the lawn… Read More

3 hours ago
  • News

Reviving Tanzania’s Regional Leadership And Global Engagement

Tanzania has recently begun to re-emerge from a period of damaging isolationism under former president… Read More

1 day ago
  • Business

The Best U.S. Companies To Work For According To LinkedIn

In this graphic, we list the 15 best U.S. companies to work for in 2024,… Read More

1 day ago
  • Lifestyle

Incremental Development: How To Avoid The Bust By Avoiding The Boom

If you’re among the large number of Americans who want to see rents come down and stay down, then… Read More

2 days ago
  • Lifestyle

US Long-Term Care Costs Are Sky-High, But Washington State’s New Way To Help Pay For Them Could Be Nixed

If you needed long-term care, could you afford it? For many Americans, especially those with… Read More

2 days ago
  • Lifestyle

5 NSF Projects Transforming How Researchers Understand Plastic Waste

The U.S. National Science Foundation champions research on how plastic impacts the planet. These five… Read More

3 days ago

This website uses cookies.