Image Courtesy Of The Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists
How do you pitch a news story about people agreeing rigorously with each other?
That question was raised by a journalist during a report presentation at the UN by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Independent Task Force on Research with Pandemic Risks. This 28-member task force, consisting of ourselves and other experts in biosafety, biosecurity, microbiology, epidemiology, and ethics from around the world, was taking questions about its new report, which tackles the highly challenging topic of recommending constructive ways to improve safety and security for research with known and potentially pandemic pathogens. The report was especially noteworthy because the diverse task force—some of whom publicly and vehemently disagree on which activities are risky and should be better monitored—was able to find common ground, and a lot of it.
This article was written by Filippa Lentzos and Jens H. Kuhn and originally published by The Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists.
Click here to read the rest of the article.
George Washington knew his forces could not win the American Revolutionary War without some measure… Read More
Asian rice prices logged their biggest monthly gain in nearly two decades in May, as… Read More
Earlier this year, researchers at King’s College London gave three commercial AI models—GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4,… Read More
A new article digs into how sleep, the brain’s process for clearing waste, and dementia… Read More
Strong opposition kicks in when data center demand surpasses 5% of a country's power supply.… Read More
Earlier this week, we covered Oklo’s approval by Chris Wright’s DOE to convert plutonium previously set for… Read More
This website uses cookies.