Image Courtesy Of The Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists
How do you pitch a news story about people agreeing rigorously with each other?
That question was raised by a journalist during a report presentation at the UN by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Independent Task Force on Research with Pandemic Risks. This 28-member task force, consisting of ourselves and other experts in biosafety, biosecurity, microbiology, epidemiology, and ethics from around the world, was taking questions about its new report, which tackles the highly challenging topic of recommending constructive ways to improve safety and security for research with known and potentially pandemic pathogens. The report was especially noteworthy because the diverse task force—some of whom publicly and vehemently disagree on which activities are risky and should be better monitored—was able to find common ground, and a lot of it.
This article was written by Filippa Lentzos and Jens H. Kuhn and originally published by The Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists.
Click here to read the rest of the article.
U.S. phone customers pay more than $340,000 a year for an Anchorage company to keep… Read More
If you've lived in Ventura County for several years, you've probably noticed that the community… Read More
The 2026 FIFA World Cup is awarding $655 million in performance prize money, making it the richest… Read More
SpudCell is a big step toward synthetic biology's dream of building life from scratch. Synthetic… Read More
If you knew you were standing inside a stock market bubble, you wouldn’t be standing… Read More
A nationwide credit card outage in Japan disrupted shop payments, rail pass purchases and Mobile… Read More
This website uses cookies.